Unprepared or weaker Franchisors including particularly those who do not prescribe to competent franchisor practices or fail to provide reasonable value to the franchisees might find themselves vulnerable to a variety of difficulties, when the Consumer Protection Act comes in to operation during October later this year.
In terms of the Act, the definition of “Franchise Agreement” is a fairly broad and may well extend to, not only full business concept franchise agreements, but also to license, agency and distribution agreements, which creates a risk not only for the franchise industry but also to any relationship or contract which falls within this broad definition.
The franchise agreement must be in writing and signed by or on behalf of the franchisee. It must also include prescribed information such as information which would generally be found in a disclosure document and must be stated in plain and understandable language. The disclosure requirements will be set out in the regulations which should be published during or about March 2010. The regulations are also likely to set out additional information which will be necessary in relation to certain categories of information or industries.
There is a 10 (ten) day cooling off period during which a franchisee may cancel a franchise agreement, without cost or penalty, by simply giving notice to the franchisor.
The general effective date of the Act will be on or about 24 October 2010. In terms of the transitional provisions, the Act will not apply to pre-existing franchise agreements, as at that date. It appears however that that it will apply to any franchise agreements renewed thereafter. The Act will from that date probably apply to at least some transactions which are entered into between the franchisor and franchisee, in relation to the sale of products or provision of services.
The Consumer Protection Act is in the nature of a consumer bill of rights and includes many key concepts such as the right to equality; privacy; choice; disclosure and information; fair and responsible marketing; honest dealing and fair agreements; fair value, good quality and safety and suppliers accountability, certain of which will be briefly covered below.
With regard to the right of choice, Section 13 of the Act provides, that a supplier (franchisor) must not require as a condition of offering to supply or supplying any goods or services or as a condition of entering into an agreement, that the consumer must: -
unless the supplier can show that the convenience to the consumer in bundling the goods and services outweighs the consumer’s limitation of choice; or the bundling of these goods or services appears to result in economic benefit to consumers. It is a defense to any contravention of this section, if the goods or services are reasonably related to the franchisor’s branded products or services. This phrase is not particularly clear. It is suggested that consideration be given to, for example, providing for core and non core products and services in franchise agreements. The core products or services would be the primary, unique or the most important products or services which are related to the brand or franchise. “Reasonably related” to the brand is also not defined and a brief justification or explanation about how the products are unique, important and related to the brand, might reduce any vulnerability.
With regard to the aforementioned key concepts of the Act, the following should be noted:
The powers of a court or tribunal to ensure fair and just conduct, terms and conditions are substantial. If such a court or tribunal determines that a transaction or an agreement is in whole or in part unconscionable, unreasonable or unjust, the court may make an order it considers fair and reasonable in the circumstances including the restoration of money or property to the consumer and compensation to the consumer for losses or expenses in relation to the transaction; and order the supplier to cease any such practice.
In addition a court may also make an order severing any part of an agreement, provision or notice, or if it is reasonable to do so, alter it to render it lawful. It may also declare the entire agreement, provision or notice void, as from the date it took effect and may make any order that is just or reasonable in the circumstances.
As a result franchisors should:
It is also very important to note that circumstances, provisions or terms of an agreement which are reasonable at the time of signature of the agreement may become unreasonable or unjust at a later time. As a result the franchisors should, on an ongoing basis, have an awareness of and comply with the provisions of the Act.
It is further recommended that franchisors audit their franchise agreements and disclosure documents for compliance regarding the following: -